Details
Case Code : CLINDM007
Publication date : 2006
Subject : Industrial Marketing
Industry : Manufacturing
Teaching Note : Available
Length : 06 Pages
Price : Rs. 100
To download this case click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
»
Industrial Marketing
Short Case Studies
»
Marketing Case Studies**
» Case Studies Collection
»
ICMR Courseware
»
View Detailed Pricing Info
Key words:
Reliance Industries Limited (RIL),
National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), Liquefied natural gas, Yemen LNG,
Petronas LNG, Economic times, Bank guarantee, power generation capacity, Five
year plan, Tenders, Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement, Price bids, British thermal
units, Agreement of sale, Krishna Godavari basin, Demand and supply, Competitive
bidding policy, Legal action.
Note
* This caselet is intended for use only in class discussions.
** More comprehensive case studies are priced at Rs.200 to Rs.700 (US $5 to US
$16) per copy.
Abstract:
The caselet deals with the transparent, competitive bidding
policy of NTPC for purchasing liquefied natural gas (LNG). In this respect, the
case also examines the various problems involved in the proposed Gas Sale and
Purchase Agreement between Reliance Industries Limited and NTPC
Issues: |
RIL gave an ultimatum to NTPC that it should either sign the contract or RIL
would pay the bank guarantee amount of US$4million to NTPC and wind up the
contract. As part of the proposed agreement RIL was to supply liquefied natural
gas (LNG) to NTPC.
NTPC is India's largest and the world's sixth largest power generator. It was
set up in 1975 by Government of India and had an installed power generation
capacity of 23,749 MW (as on March 31, 2005).
This accounted for around 19 percent of India's total power requirements. NTPC,
as part of its long-term plans, was going through a phased capacity expansion by
establishing new power plants and acquiring existing power plants...
Questions for Discussion:
1. “Do you think RIL breached the contract agreement, since the contract was
awarded to it based on its ability to provide the gas from 2007 and at a
specified rate quoted by RIL?” Give reasons for your answer.
2. This is a typical case of pre-contractual conflict. How do you think this
dispute can be solved?